Thursday, June 7, 2012


 Sustainapparel

               Environmental conservation and sustainability in any industry are some of the most important topics of my generation. For this reason, it is my opinion that we be educated in these topics and be ready to face the challenges they present. While important in all industries, these issues are especially significant in fashion and design. Designers throughout the apparel industry must decide for themselves whether or not to be sustainable. There are two basic schools of thought. The first school of thought advocates the “all or nothing ” approach, which The Designer’s Atlas of Sustainability by Ann Thorpe calls the purist approach.   Another is, “the quick fix” which Thorpe refers to this as the impure approach.  I believe we can learn from both sides and begin to make progress towards a better environment for future generations.  For the Apparel Industry to improve the sustainability of its products there must be compromise amongst the key players such as: designers, manufacturers, government, distributors and consumers.  Our industry currently is unsustainable due to many years of bad practices, and I do not believe we will be able to solve this problem quickly. 

              We learn in Shifting the New Dominant Social Paradigm in the Apparel Industry:  Acknowledging the Pink Elephant by Armstrong and LeHew that the downward spiral toward unsustainability began with the industrial revolution, and the resultant mass-production of products.  Products became much more readily available, which led to a general decrease in pricing and ultimately causing consumer demand to dramatically increase.  This elevated demand created a higher need for the supplies used in the manufacturing of consumer products, which led to an overuse and reduced availability of our natural resources.  A consumer culture was created as a result of the advances in production, which led to consumers quickly disposing of products because they wanted the newer, better model or version.  We are now disposing of products at a faster pace than we can replenish them.  This process then repeats and builds upon itself creating a continuous cycle of destruction to the environment.  Something needs to be done but the question is How? Who? What?

             According to Fashioning Sustainability: Forum of the Future, there are many factors that make it difficult for the fashion industry to change. This includes a cascade of procedures and steps that must be performed in order to attempt to initiate any sort of change in regards to sustainability. It is also extremely difficult to monitor and ensure that sustainable practices are being maintained, but it is vital that we in the fashion industry be willing to step up and be willing to make necessary sacrifices in order to initiate change. The initial reforms must begin with the design itself. The Design Atlas says that today’s definition of a good design is any design that sells.  This does not take into account any environmental or social issues.  A sustainable designer must consider how their design affects the environment from start to finish with questions such as:  What materials they will use and how will the consumer care for them?  Will the farmer use harmful pesticides that could harm himself or his workers?  How is the product dyed?  Will the production line have ‘sweatshops’ where the workforce is underpaid, work excessive hours in dangerous conditions or employ children?  This just scratches the surface of the things one should consider to create a sustainable product.  Fashioning Sustainability explains how the supply chain is difficult to follow and that transparency of operations is key to uncovering the hazardous practices that can occur. For example, PUMA is a company that has launched a long-term sustainable program and they have just introduced new packaging for their shoes.  Check out this video to see how this one decision is positively affecting our environment.  
              Another important factor that needs to be considered is consumerism.  As stated earlier, the consumer has been taught the more you have the better you are.  With this kind of thinking, it is difficult to apply the concept of sustainability.  According to Armstrong and LeHew, a paradigm shift has to happen in the apparel industry for significant change to happen.  Changing consumer habits will not be easy.  I am the consumer that needs to shift my behavior and I know how I love to buy new clothes, but I do believe it is not an impossible task.  Designer Katharine Hamnett used this t-shirt design to bring attention to the plight of cotton farmers in the hopes of inspiring the public to change its buying habits.
                                                                                 
http://www.ejfoundation.org/page676.html

Here is another example of how a major company is trying to encourage change in consumer behavior.  The Disney channel has decided not to advertise any junk food on its commercials during their morning cartoons.  I believe that pressure from consumer groups to fight childhood obesity has had an influence on this decision.  I know this doesn’t affect our industry but we can learn from their lead.  What if Macy’s, a large retailer, decided to only advertise with companies that used organic cotton, what would the result be?
                                                                      
    
 Link to article on Disney: 
              
             The apparel industry has had many years to establish the hazardous conditions that we see today and there may not be a quick fix to this extensive problem, but there does seem to shift in the way the fashion industry does business and changes are beginning to be made. But this is just the tip of the iceberg.  The industry must now move toward the deeper problems. We must now become conscious of the underlying issues that are not visible from the surface including our habits, practices and behaviors as consumers and pursue further changes to better obtain a more sustainable industry.  This is an achievable goal.  No one would have believed 50 years ago that smoking in restaurants or the work place would be taboo, but they are due to a paradigm shift. The old adage of knowledge is power is extremely applicable in this situation. It is crucial for this topic to get out to the general public. We not only as members of the apparel industry but also as consumers have a responsibility to better understand the importance of sustainability. As we become more knowledgeable about the issues at hand, we will ultimately become better equipped to resolve the challenges with which we are faced.

Here are websites that show you companies that are already trying make a difference:


Patagonia
http://www.patagonia.com/us/footprint/


Nike’s adopted waterless dyeing techniques


4 Ways Timberland Will Halve Its Carbon Footprint by 2015

North Face's First CSR Report Reveals Green Goals, Early Progress
http://www.nordicfashionassociation.com/28236/

Target Hits a Bullseye Introducing Sustainability to a Mass Market












14 comments:

  1. Carly, that video was very neat!! I think the more that companies began to vocalize their plans for sustainability, the more other companies will open up about. I also think that consumers will be on board with sustainability plans when they see that their favorite designers are. I just read an article on a childhood obesity study today. The study showed that children liked the snacks with cartoon characters on them better than the ones that didn't. I think this just proves that once adults see their favorite brands support sustainability, they will too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Cara,
    Thank you for your comment. I agree with you. The more companies that realize consumers want to support companies that are “green”; they will want to get on board. We are creatures of habit, so if they want our brand loyalty they better join in soon. What are your favorite brands of clothes to buy and do you know if they are practicing any kind of sustainability program?

    Carly

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love that question! J. Crew is one of my all-time favorites! I did not know of any of their sustainable practices but when I went to look, I found some interesting information. They have a policy called "The J.Crew Paper Procurement Policy". This means that they evaluate the environmental procedures of all of their suppliers. This includes preference for suppliers who disclose fiber sources and who are able to track their sources back to the forest they came from. They are also highly encourage recycling and understand their duty to keep eco-friendly. J. Crew also prefers companies who have new ideas for a cleaner environment. I'm a big fan of nike shorts as well. Nike is often in the news about their sustainable practices. They have a set of "value areas" that they focus on to make sure the entire process is environmentally friendly. These values include: planning, designing, making, moving, selling, using and reusing. I love that they individually focus on each part of the process. I know with all the articles I have recently read, it seems like people get lost in the final product but they never go into detail about the entire journey. I appreciate that NIke is taking a stand for sustainability. What is your favorite brand and do they practice sustainability?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing this, Cara. More and more companies are creating these "supplier" policies, and when you are a big company like J. Crew (or Wal-mart), suppliers need to comply or they will find themselves without an important account.

      Delete
  4. Carly,
    I loved reading your blog! You went into great detail and I completely understood what you were arguing. I have noticed that a lot of the general public does not know how bad the downfall of our environment is becoming. What do you think are some approaches that could be used to inform the general public about the hazards of mass disposal?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Cara,

    I love to shop at Anthropologie. They just launched a new website called Made in Kind. It will feature multiple exhibitions per month, each dedicated to a single designer or concept.” It does highlight sustainable brands such as Place Nationale, Samantha Pleet and John Patrick of Organic but it is vague about what its company is doing on sustainability. In 2011, they collaborated with Salem-based Cork Forest Conservation Alliance. The Alliance donated over two million corks that they incorporated in their window display. It was part of a campaign to help build awareness for conservation of the Mediterranean Cork Forest. This was the first time they devoted window space for a promotion other than their own. I was amazed at the amount of cork they used in their display. Seems a little wasteful, since they are trying to save the Cork Forest.

    Carly

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thats so cool!! Anthropologie always has incredible window displays! These blogs talk a lot about the merchandise but what can stores do to reduce energy consumption in-store? I've recently seen ads for cork flooring, what type of sustainable materials do you think could be used in the actual brick and mortar store?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cara,
      I think a great way for them to incorporate reduced energy consumption in store would be to have a solar roof paneling system that is used for their lights and air conditioning. This will tremendously reduce their costs and help the environment at the same time. What are some of your thoughts regarding this subject?

      Carly

      Delete
    2. I think thats a great idea!! I think for window displays you could always use "material" aka trash to make cool designs. I know one year the Anthropologie in Tulsa used pomp, like the ones used for homecoming, these pieces of tissue paper are flame resistant. Pacon, the company who sells the pomp, is an official supplier of SFI (Sustainable Forest Initiative) products. Decorations are also so easy to do if you look around for items that you could refurbish. For flooring you could even do old barn wood.

      Delete
  7. Rachel,

    Thank you for your input. You ask a great question. This morning I went to the local farmers market. As I approached, I noticed banners with advertisements on them for local businesses. This could be a perfect avenue for informing the general public; a banner dedicated to the problems that exist with mass disposal. Another media tool is the Internet. This would reach far more people than a banner in my small hometown, but we must never underestimate the power of a grass roots movement.

    Carly

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Carly,
      That's awesome. I unfortunately have never been to a farmer's market and I really want to sometime! A banner wold be a perfect idea. Especially since they are normally large and catch people's attentions. And the Internet as well because almost everyone in today's society has a computer.

      Delete
  8. Hi, Carly;
    Wow, you have a lot of action going on on your site! This is awesome! Your blog is exceptional. You have done a very nice job synthesizing these readings from your perspective, then embellishing those with research. These are great industry examples and I love that there is more sharing happening in your group, helping you to learn about what is happening in your field. Puma has saved a lot of money as well as emissions by converting to this stylish little shoe bag, just by eliminating the weight from the packaging, not to mention, you can use it again! This is a great example of design thinking!
    Great job this week, keep it up!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr. Armstrong,
      Thank you so much for your positive feedback! I enjoyed researching sustainable, apparel companies. I did not realize how many companies are moving toward being more Eco friendly than I thought. I look forward to writing next weeks blog.

      Carly

      Delete